Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI Jun-xiang, PAN Wen-qi, QI Ke-qi, WANG Shao-xin, DONG Peng. Reconstruction of torsion pendulum ground vibration response via fourier feature network[J]. Chinese Optics. doi: 10.37188/CO.2026-0083
Citation: LI Jun-xiang, PAN Wen-qi, QI Ke-qi, WANG Shao-xin, DONG Peng. Reconstruction of torsion pendulum ground vibration response via fourier feature network[J]. Chinese Optics. doi: 10.37188/CO.2026-0083

Reconstruction of torsion pendulum ground vibration response via fourier feature network

cstr: 32171.14.CO.2026-0083
Funds:  Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2024YFC2207203)
More Information
  • To address the signal reconstruction problem of high-Q torsion pendulum systems under ground seismic excitation in ordinary laboratory environments—pertinent to ground testing for space gravitational wave detection—a curriculum learning-driven Fourier feature network (FouCLNet) is proposed. Existing hardware isolation strategies impose stringent environmental requirements that are difficult to meet in ordinary ground laboratories. Traditional physics-informed neural networks suffer from spectral bias, gradient conflict, and an inherent tendency for outputs to decay toward zero in high-Q oscillatory systems. Log-spaced Fourier feature mapping is employed with frequency parameters uniformly distributed over the 0.003–0.02 Hz band to match the 0.007 Hz natural frequency of the pendulum. A four-layer fully connected network is constructed, and a hard amplitude constraint loss function is designed to prevent attenuation of micro-radian-scale signals. Through a three-stage curriculum learning strategy, weak physical constraints are progressively introduced with PDE residual weights annealed to the order of 1e-8. Using the torsional response under seismic noise excitation as the target physical quantity and fourth-order Runge-Kutta integration results as ground-truth labels, we randomly sample 80% of time points for training and 20% for in-distribution validation. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves a correlation coefficient of 0.9988 on the training set, peak error below 0.4% full scale, 100% amplitude matching, and power spectral density agreement at the 0.007 Hz resonance peak. The in-distribution discrete validation set achieves a correlation coefficient of 0.9958, and the single-point inference latency is merely 0.524 ms. Ablation studies indicate that removing Fourier features or hard amplitude constraints leads to severe model degradation. The pure data-driven configuration achieves good accuracy on the discrete validation set, yet its correlation coefficient drops sharply to 0.511 in continuous-segment reconstruction, whereas the full method maintains 0.986, indicating that weak physical constraints stabilize continuous temporal consistency. Temporal extrapolation beyond the training domain yields a correlation coefficient of merely 0.019, accompanied by spurious low-frequency drift. Furthermore, the model fails to generalize to continuous unseen periods within the training domain (R ≈ 0.029). Consequently, the proposed method is unsuitable for predictive extrapolation beyond the temporal scope of the training data and should be strictly confined to interpolation scenarios within the established training domain. The method provides a high-fidelity in-distribution interpolation reconstruction reference for torsion pendulum systems in ordinary laboratory environments and offers guidance for developing causal real-time vibration suppression algorithms.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    HU W R, WU Y L. The Taiji program in space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity[J]. National Science Review, 2017, 4(5): 685-686. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwx116
    [2]
    DANZMANN K. LISA - an ESA cornerstone mission for the detection and observation of gravitational waves[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2003, 32(7): 1233-1242. doi: 10.1016/s0273-1177(03)90323-1
    [3]
    罗子人, 白姗, 边星, 等. 空间激光干涉引力波探测[J]. 力学进展, 2013, 43(4): 415-447.

    LUO Z R, BAI SH, BIAN X, et al. Gravitational wave detection by space laser interferometry[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2013, 43(4): 415-447. (in Chinese).
    [4]
    LUO J, CHEN L SH, DUAN H Z, et al. TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector[J]. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 2016, 33(3): 035010. doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/33/3/035010
    [5]
    李华东, 高志勇, 王智. 引力参考传感器地面测试扭摆研究进展[J]. 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学, 2024, 54(7): 270406.

    LI H D, GAO ZH Y, WANG ZH. Research progress on torsion pendulum in ground testing of gravitational reference sensor: a review[J]. Scientia Sinica Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica, 2024, 54(7): 270406. (in Chinese).
    [6]
    HUELLER M, CAVALLERI A, DOLESI R, et al. Torsion pendulum facility for ground testing of gravitational sensors for LISA[J]. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 2002, 19(7): 1757-1765. doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/19/7/372
    [7]
    ZHOU Z B, LIU L, TU H B, et al. Seismic noise limit for ground-based performance measurements of an inertial sensor using a torsion balance[J]. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 2010, 27(17): 175012. doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/27/17/175012
    [8]
    TAN D Y, YIN H, ZHOU Z B. Seismic noise suppression for ground-based investigation of an inertial sensor by suspending the electrode cage[J]. Chinese Physics Letters, 2015, 32(9): 090401. doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/32/9/090401
    [9]
    TAN D Y, LIU L, HU M, et al. Seismic noise effect reduction improvement for ground-based investigation of space inertial sensor by suspending the electrode housing with an individual pendulum[J]. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 2022, 39(7): 075029. doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/ac5a12
    [10]
    TU H B, BAI Y Z, ZHOU Z B, et al. Performance measurements of an inertial sensor with a two-stage controlled torsion pendulum[J]. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 2010, 27(20): 205016. doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/27/20/205016
    [11]
    王继河, 孟云鹤, 宋佳凝, 等. 空间引力波探测系统数值与半物理仿真技术综述[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 60(S1): 233-238. doi: 10.13471/j.cnki.acta.snus.2020.11.10.2020B124

    WANG J H, MENG Y H, SONG J N, et al. Review of numerical and hardware-in-the-loop simulation technology of space-borne gravitational wave detection system[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 2021, 60(S1): 233-238. doi: 10.13471/j.cnki.acta.snus.2020.11.10.2020B124
    [12]
    KELLY I. LIGO seismic state characterization using machine learning techniques[R]. Pasadena: LIGO Technical Report, 2023.
    [13]
    REISSEL C, LAI D, DWIVEDI S, et al. Microseismic noise mitigation with machine learning for advanced LIGO[EB/OL]. (2025-11-24)[2026-05-30]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.19682. (查阅网上资料,不确定文献类型及格式是否正确,请确认).
    [14]
    RAISSI M, PERDIKARIS P, KARNIADAKIS G E. Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 378: 686-707. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045
    [15]
    KARNIADAKIS G E, KEVREKIDIS I G, LU L, et al. Physics-informed machine learning[J]. Nature Reviews Physics, 2021, 3(6): 422-440. doi: 10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5
    [16]
    KRISHNAPRIYAN A S, GHOLAMI A, ZHE SH D, et al. Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networks[C]. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates Inc. , 2021: 2033.
    [17]
    WANG S F, WANG H W, PERDIKARIS P. On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks: from regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networks[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, 384: 113938. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2021.113938
    [18]
    WANG S F, YU X L, PERDIKARIS P. When and why PINNs fail to train: a neural tangent kernel perspective[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2022, 449: 110768. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110768
    [19]
    KHODAKARAMI S, OOMMEN V, DARYAKENARI N A, et al. Spectral bias in physics-informed and operator learning: analysis and mitigation guidelines[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2026, 461: 119156. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2026.119156
    [20]
    RAHAMAN N, BARATIN A, ARPIT D, et al. On the spectral bias of neural networks[C]. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 2019: 5301-5310.
    [21]
    TANCIK M, SRINIVASAN P P, MILDENHALL B, et al. Fourier features let networks learn high frequency functions in low dimensional domains[C]. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates Inc. , 2020: 632.
    [22]
    SITZMANN V, MARTEL J N P, BERGMAN A W, et al. Implicit neural representations with periodic activation functions[C]. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates Inc. , 2020: 626.
    [23]
    MILDENHALL B, SRINIVASAN P P, TANCIK M, et al. NeRF: representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2022, 65(1): 99-106. doi: 10.1145/3503250
    [24]
    CHEN H L, HUANG L ZH, LIU T R, et al. Fourier Imager Network (FIN): a deep neural network for hologram reconstruction with superior external generalization[J]. Light: Science & Applications, 2022, 11(1): 254, doi: 10.1038/s41377-022-00949-8.
    [25]
    曾晓强, 李磐, 董鹏, 等. 引力波探测中激光干涉量子噪声计算[J]. 中国光学(中英文), 2025, 18(3): 698-703. doi: 10.37188/CO.2024-0180

    ZENG X Q, LI P, DONG P, et al. Calculation of laser interferometric quantum noise in gravitational wave detection[J]. Chinese Optics, 2025, 18(3): 698-703. doi: 10.37188/CO.2024-0180
    [26]
    叶磊巧, 杜明辉, 徐鹏, 等. 空间引力波探测“太极计划”星间姿态-光程耦合噪声迭代拟合与高精度抑制方法[J]. 中国光学(中英文), 2025, 18(3): 583-595. doi: 10.37188/CO.2025-0042

    YE L Q, DU M H, XU P, et al. Iterative estimation and precision suppression of inter-spacecraft tilt-to-length coupling noise for the Taiji space gravitational wave detection mission[J]. Chinese Optics, 2025, 18(3): 583-595. doi: 10.37188/CO.2025-0042
    [27]
    方子若, 朱振才, 蔡志鸣, 等. 空间引力波探测航天器光学测距噪声链路指标优化[J]. 中国光学(中英文), 2025, 18(3): 568-582. doi: 10.37188/CO.2024-0185

    FANG Z R, ZHU ZH C, CAI ZH M, et al. Optimization of optical metrology noise link metrics for space-based gravitational wave detection spacecraft[J]. Chinese Optics, 2025, 18(3): 568-582. doi: 10.37188/CO.2024-0185
    [28]
    王雷刚, 云恩学, 罗鑫, 等. 空间引力波探测中超低附加相噪频综研究[J]. 中国光学(中英文), 2025, 18(3): 661-671. doi: 10.37188/CO.2025-0015

    WANG L G, YUN E X, LUO X, et al. Ultralow residual phase noise frequency synthesizer for space gravitational wave detection[J]. Chinese Optics, 2025, 18(3): 661-671. doi: 10.37188/CO.2025-0015
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(7)  / Tables(5)

    Article views(9) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return