| Citation: | ZHANG YUE, YIN Hao-ran, WANG SHUO, HAN Xiao-quan, ZOU Cheng-jun, WU Xiao-bin. A generalized adjoint optimization method for metasurfaces enabled by phase-convergence[J]. Chinese Optics. doi: 10.37188/CO.2025-0161 |
Metasurfaces enable lightweight, highly integrated optical systems, offering a compact alternative to conventional bulky components. However, forward design methods based on local periodic approximation inevitably suffer from efficiency degradation resulting from inter-element couplings. While adjoint-based inverse design methods can overcome these limitations, current adjoint optimization algorithms remain task-specific across different metasurface designs. Their adjoint excitations must be reconstructed for each prescribed target field, making the workflow cumbersome and often incurring high computational costs and propagation errors for far-field or off-axis objectives. To address this challenge, we propose a generalized adjoint-optimization method enabled by a phase-convergence mechanism. Central to this method is a gradient-to-structure mapping model that translates complex-valued adjoint gradients into physically realizable structural updates, establishing a stable iterative relation between structural perturbations and the resulting phase response. This mechanism ensures monotonic phase convergence at the device plane, enabling meta-element-level control of arbitrary phase profiles. Within this formulation, the adjoint simulation employs a single electric dipole excitation, independent of the desired metasurface function. Functional diversity is achieved solely by adjusting the update mapping rather than redefining the adjoint source or modifying the simulation model. This establishes a unified and computationally efficient inverse-design framework capable of handling multiple types of wavefront-shaping functionalities. As proof of concept, numerical validations are performed on diverse metadevices. Specifically, a 2D nanopillar metalens and a linear phase gradient metagrating achieved efficiencies of 83.9% and 72.4% (at 30° deflection), respectively. For arbitrary wavefront shaping, a bifocal lens showed a focusing efficiency of 67.2% and a holographic metasurface generated a hollow triangle pattern with 60.3% energy efficiency. Our results confirm that the proposed method features simplified source construction, high computational efficiency, and strong adaptability, providing a unified and viable framework for the engineering of metasurfaces in imaging, wavefront engineering, and ultraviolet detection.
| [1] |
YU N F, CAPASSO F. Flat optics with designer metasurfaces[J]. Nature Materials, 2014, 13(2): 139-150. doi: 10.1038/nmat3839
|
| [2] |
PERTSCH T, XIAO SH M, MAJUMDAR A, et al. Optical metasurfaces: fundamentals and applications[J]. Photonics Research, 2023, 11(5): OMFA1-OMFA3. doi: 10.1364/PRJ.487440
|
| [3] |
QIU Y, YAN D X, FENG Q Y, et al. Vanadium dioxide-assisted switchable multifunctional metamaterial structure[J]. Optics Express, 2022, 30(15): 26544-26556. doi: 10.1364/OE.465062
|
| [4] |
KILDISHEV A V, BOLTASSEVA A, SHALAEV V M. Planar photonics with metasurfaces[J]. Science, 2013, 339(6125): 1232009. doi: 10.1126/science.1232009
|
| [5] |
HU ZH K, GU M N, TIAN Y, et al. Review for optical metalens based on metasurfaces: fabrication and applications[J]. Microsystems & Nanoengineering, 2025, 11(1): 189. doi: 10.1038/s41378-025-01064-5
|
| [6] |
XU M X, YAN D X, WANG Y, et al. Graphene-assisted dual-frequency third harmonic generation in nonlinear metamaterials for high-efficiency on-chip terahertz integration[J]. Frontiers of Physics, 2026, 21(4): 044201. doi: 10.15302/frontphys.2026.044201
|
| [7] |
CHEN W T, ZHU A Y, SANJEEV V, et al. A broadband achromatic metalens for focusing and imaging in the visible[J]. Nature Nanotechnology, 2018, 13(3): 220-226. doi: 10.1038/s41565-017-0034-6
|
| [8] |
KIM J, KIM Y, KIM W, et al. 8″ wafer-scale, centimeter-sized, high-efficiency metalenses in the ultraviolet[J]. Materials Today, 2024, 73: 9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2024.01.010
|
| [9] |
ZENG Y H, ZHONG H P, LONG ZH W, et al. From performance to structure: a comprehensive survey of advanced metasurface design for next-generation imaging[J]. npj Nanophotonics, 2025, 2(1): 39. doi: 10.1038/s44310-025-00081-6
|
| [10] |
KAMALI S M, ARBABI E, KWON H, et al. Metasurface-generated complex 3-dimensional optical fields for interference lithography[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019, 116(43): 21379-21384.
|
| [11] |
KAGIAS M, LEE S, FRIEDMAN A C, et al. Metasurface-enabled holographic lithography for impact-absorbing nanoarchitected sheets[J]. Advanced Materials, 2023, 35(13): 2209153.
|
| [12] |
ZHAO J, ZHANG L, LIANG H W. Advances in metasurface‐based terahertz sensing[J]. Advanced Physics Research, 2024, 3(12): 2400077. doi: 10.1002/apxr.202400077
|
| [13] |
IWANAGA M, HU Q, TANG Y H. Metasurface biosensors: status and prospects[J]. Applied Physics Reviews, 2025, 12(2): 021305. doi: 10.1063/5.0253333
|
| [14] |
CAO Y J, WU CH J, LI X J, et al. A deep learning-surrogate optimization strategy for the design of two-dimensional terahertz metamaterial absorbers[J]. Infrared Physics & Technology, 2026, 153: 106350. doi: 10.1016/j.infrared.2025.106350
|
| [15] |
COTRUFO M, ESFAHANI S, KOROBKIN D, et al. Temporal signal processing with nonlocal optical metasurfaces[J]. npj Nanophotonics, 2024, 1(1): 39. doi: 10.1038/s44310-024-00039-0
|
| [16] |
ZHOU H Q, ZHAO CH L, HE C, et al. Optical computing metasurfaces: applications and advances[J]. Nanophotonics, 2024, 13(4): 419-441. doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2023-0871
|
| [17] |
LI L L, ZHAO H T, LIU CH, et al. Intelligent metasurfaces: control, communication and computing[J]. eLight, 2022, 2(1): 7. doi: 10.1186/s43593-022-00013-3
|
| [18] |
ARBABI A, HORIE Y, BAGHERI M, et al. Dielectric metasurfaces for complete control of phase and polarization with subwavelength spatial resolution and high transmission[J]. Nature nanotechnology, 2015, 10(11): 937-943. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.186
|
| [19] |
PAN M Y, FU Y F, ZHENG M J, et al. Dielectric metalens for miniaturized imaging systems: progress and challenges[J]. Light: Science & Applications, 2022, 11(1): 195.
|
| [20] |
ISNARD E, HÉRON S, LANTERI S, et al. Advancing wavefront shaping with resonant nonlocal metasurfaces: beyond the limitations of lookup tables[J]. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1): 1555. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51898-8
|
| [21] |
CHOI M, PARK J, SHIN J, et al. Realization of high-performance optical metasurfaces over a large area: a review from a design perspective[J]. npj Nanophotonics, 2024, 1(1): 31. doi: 10.1038/s44310-024-00029-2
|
| [22] |
ZHOU Y L, LIU Y K, LIANG H W, et al. Efficient inverse design of large-scale, ultrahigh-numerical-aperture metalens[J]. Photonics, 2024, 11(10): 940. doi: 10.3390/photonics11100940
|
| [23] |
LI ZH Y, PESTOURIE R, LIN Z, et al. Empowering metasurfaces with inverse design: principles and applications[J]. ACS Photonics, 2022, 9(7): 2178-2192. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01850
|
| [24] |
ELSAWY M M R, LANTERI S, DUVIGNEAU R, et al. Numerical optimization methods for metasurfaces[J]. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 2020, 14(10): 1900445. doi: 10.1002/lpor.201900445
|
| [25] |
KANG C, PARK C, LEE M, et al. Large-scale photonic inverse design: computational challenges and breakthroughs[J]. Nanophotonics, 2024, 13(20): 3765-3792. doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2024-0127
|
| [26] |
YANG G T, XIAO Q X, ZHANG ZH L, et al. Exploring AI in metasurface structures with forward and inverse design[J]. iScience, 2025, 28(3): 111995. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111995
|
| [27] |
PAN Z Y, PAN X M. Deep learning and adjoint method accelerated inverse design in photonics: a review[J]. Photonics, 2023, 10(7): 852. doi: 10.3390/photonics10070852
|
| [28] |
ZHONG G B, XU H D, ZHANG R T, et al. Highly efficient perfectly vertical grating couplers based on the adjoint optimization for O-band operation[J]. Optics Communications, 2025, 596: 132505. doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2025.132505
|
| [29] |
XU H D, TIAN Y, LI Y, et al. Inverse design of highly-efficient and broadband polarization beam splitter on SOI platform[J]. Optics Communications, 2024, 572: 130986. doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2024.130986
|
| [30] |
SELL D, YANG J J, DOSHAY S, et al. Large-angle, multifunctional metagratings based on freeform multimode geometries[J]. Nano Letters, 2017, 17(6): 3752-3757. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01082
|
| [31] |
桑迪, 徐明峰, 安强, 等. 基于拓扑优化的自由形状波分复用超光栅[J]. 物理学报, 2022, 71(22): 224204. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221013
SANG D, XU M F, AN Q, et al. Freeform wavelength division multiplexing metagrating based on topology optimization[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(22): 224204. (in Chinese). doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221013
|
| [32] |
DAINESE P, MARRA L, CASSARA D, et al. Shape optimization for high efficiency metasurfaces: theory and implementation[J]. Light: Science & Applications, 2024, 13(1): 300.
|
| [33] |
ZHANG D S, LIU ZH ZH, YANG X T, et al. Inverse design of multifunctional metasurface based on multipole decomposition and the adjoint method[J]. ACS Photonics, 2022, 9(12): 3899-3905. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c01187
|
| [34] |
MILLER O D. Photonic design: from fundamental solar cell physics to computational inverse design[D]. Berkeley: University of California, 2012.
|
| [35] |
MANSOUREE M, KWON H, ARBABI E, et al. Multifunctional 2.5D metastructures enabled by adjoint optimization[J]. Optica, 2020, 7(1): 77-84. doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.374787
|
| [36] |
MANSOUREE M, MCCLUNG A, SAMUDRALA S, et al. Large-scale parametrized metasurface design using adjoint optimization[J]. ACS Photonics, 2021, 8(2): 455-463. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c01058
|
| [37] |
PHAN T, SELL D, WANG E W, et al. High-efficiency, large-area, topology-optimized metasurfaces[J]. Light: Science & Applications, 2019, 8: 48.
|
| [38] |
PARK J S, LIM S W D, AMIRZHAN A, et al. All-glass 100 mm diameter visible metalens for imaging the cosmos[J]. ACS Nano, 2024, 18(4): 3187-3198. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c09462
|