Design and verification of adhesive layer for detector assembly of space optical payload
-
摘要:
为满足空间光学载荷高分辨率成像需求,解决探测器与结构外框在空间极端环境下的粘接可靠性难题,本文提出一种探测器组件协同优化粘接方案。首先,结合光学载荷空间环境适应性要求,系统对比常用粘接剂核心性能,确定环氧树脂胶为主粘接剂实现探测器与结构外框刚性可靠粘连,并辅以硅橡胶缓冲应力,构建复合粘接体系;其次,建立多物理场耦合仿真模型,分析静态力学载荷及PCB焊接热传导(200 °C)对探测器感光面的应力应变与位移影响,并实现点胶量精准量化;最后,通过环境试验验证方案可靠性与稳定性。结果表明,该方案经闭环设计,有效解决高精度粘接难题,环境试验前后经显影三坐标测量仪检测探测器共面精度为0.019 mm、直线精度
0.0021 mm,搭接精度优于0.005 mm,满足空间光学载荷对于探测器组件拼接精度的要求,为该类型探测器组件精密粘接提供标准化技术基础,具有重要工程应用价值。Abstract:To meet the high-resolution imaging requirements of space-based optical payloads and address the challenge of ensuring reliable bonding between detectors and structural frames under extreme environmental conditions, this paper proposes a collaborative optimization scheme for the bonding of detector assemblies. Firstly, in accordance with the space environmental adaptability requirements of optical payloads, a systematic comparison of the core performance characteristics of commonly used adhesives was conducted. Epoxy resin was adopted as the primary bonding agent to ensure rigid and dependable attachment between the imaging unit and the support frame, while silicone rubber was employed to provide stress-buffering capability, forming a composite adhesion architecture. Subsequently, a multiphysics coupled simulation model was developed to investigate the influences of static mechanical loads and PCB soldering thermal conduction (200°C) on the stress, strain, and displacement of the photosensitive surface of the device while achieving quantitative control of adhesive. Finally, the reliability and stability of the scheme were verified through environmental testing. The results demonstrate that the closed-loop design effectively resolves the challenge of high-precision assembly. Pre- and post-test inspection using a coordinate measuring machine confirmed a coplanarity precision of 0.019 mm, a linearity precision of
0.0021 mm, and an overlap precision better than 0.005 mm. These performance levels satisfy the splicing accuracy requirements for detector components in space optical applications, providing a standardized technical foundation for the precision bonding of this type of detector component and holding significant engineering application value.-
Key words:
- space optical payload /
- detector assembly /
- epoxy bonding /
- simulation analysis /
- splicing accuracy
-
图 4 胶层厚度与剪切强度关系[13]
Figure 4. Relationship between adhesive layer thickness and shear strength
表 1 粘接剂性能比对
Table 1. Comparison of adhesive properties
名称 性能优点 固化方式 适用场景 环氧树脂胶 粘接强度高,固化收缩率低,耐候性好 常温固化 环境适应性要求较高的光学设备 UV胶 粘接强度高,固化速度可控,透明度高 紫外线照射 光学仪器中需快速固化的透镜耦合粘接 聚氨酯胶 粘接强度高,透明度高,耐低温 常温或加热固化 需要承受一定机械应力或在低温环境下工作的光学元件粘接 加拿大胶 天然树脂胶,透明度良好、折射率匹配范围宽 加热固化 传统光学镜头胶合等对性能要求相对不高的场景 硅橡胶 高强度与良好的柔韧性,耐高低温、防震 常温固化 适用非承重辅助粘接 表 2 低量级特征扫频试验条件
Table 2. Low-Level characteristic sweep test conditions
频率范围(Hz) 5~500 振动量级(O—P) 0.5 g 加载方向 X、Y、Z向 扫频速率 4 Oct/min 表 3 随机振动试验条件
Table 3. Random vibration test conditions
频率范围(Hz) 20~100 100~600 600~2000 功率谱密度 +3dB/Oct 0.04g2/Hz −6dB/Oct 总均方根加速度 6.23g rms 试验方向 X轴、Y轴、Z轴 试验时间 2min/轴向 表 4 数据复测
Table 4. Data verification by re-measurement
共面测量/mm 直线度测量/mm 拼接精度/mm 组件1 39.2549 39.2609 X11 Y11 X12 Y12 X方向 Y方向 39.2609 39.2589 0.0019 − 43.0149 0 0 0.0039 0.0024 组件2 39.2499 39.2509 X21 Y21 X22 Y22 39.2429 39.2499 − 26.9462 − 85.1684 − 26.9459 − 42.1519 组件3 39.2619 39.2559 X31 Y31 X32 Y32 39.2599 39.2599 − 26.9483 − 0.8560 − 26.9504 42.1616 最大偏差 0.019 0.0021 0.0011 0.0026 -
[1] SAKO T, SEKIGUCHI T, SASAKI M, et al. MOA-cam3: a wide-field mosaic CCD camera for a gravitational microlensing survey in New Zealand[J]. Experimental Astronomy, 2008, 22(1): 51-66. [2] 徐江涛, 王欣洋, 王廷栋, 等. 光学视觉传感器技术研究进展[J]. 中国图象图形学报, 2023, 28(6): 1630-1661. doi: 10.11834/jig.230039XU J T, WANG X Y, WANG T D, et al. Review on optical visual sensor technology[J]. Journal of Image and Graphics, 2023, 28(6): 1630-1661. (in Chinese). doi: 10.11834/jig.230039 [3] 龚大鹏. 航天遥感相机焦平面技术研究[D]. 长春: 中国科学院研究生院(长春光学精密机械与物理研究所), 2015.GONG D P. Research on focal plane technology of space remote-sensing camera[D]. Changchun: Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2015. (in Chinese). [4] 曾戈虹, 史衍丽, 庄继胜. Ⅱ类超晶格红外探测器的机理、现状与前景[J]. 红外技术, 2011, 33(6): 311-314.ZENG G H, SHI Y L, ZHUANG J SH. Principles, status and prospect of type Ⅱ superlattice infrared detectors[J]. Infrared Technology, 2011, 33(6): 311-314. (in Chinese). [5] 马小梅, 董吉洪, 李延春, 等. 空间光学遥感器CCD焦面组件的设计与分析[J]. 计算机仿真, 2008, 25(7): 321-324. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2008.07.081MA X M, DONG J H, LI Y CH, et al. Design and analysis of CCD focal plane for space optical remote sensor[J]. Computer Simulation, 2008, 25(7): 321-324. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2008.07.081 [6] 杨利伟, 李志来, 薛栋林. 结构胶固化收缩对反射镜面形影响的分析与试验[J]. 光学技术, 2014, 40(4): 307-312. doi: 10.13741/j.cnki.11-1879/o4.2014.04.005YANG L W, LI ZH L, XUE D L. Analysis and test for effect of structural adhesive shrinkage during curing on mirror surface[J]. Optical Technique, 2014, 40(4): 307-312. (in Chinese). doi: 10.13741/j.cnki.11-1879/o4.2014.04.005 [7] 熊健, 张之敬, 陈骁, 等. 精密光学元件胶接装配性能研究进展[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(22): 364-384.XIONG J, ZHANG ZH J, CHEN X, et al. Review for assembly performance of precision optical elements subjected to adhesive bonding[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 60(22): 364-384. (in Chinese). [8] AHMAD A. Handbook of Optomechanical Engineering[M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1997. [9] 李金辉, 朱英博, 丛杉珊, 等. 空间遥感相机轻型探测器组件粘接方法研究[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2024, 53(6): 202400.LI J H, ZHU Y B, CONG SH SH, et al. Research on bonding method of light detector assembly of space remote sensing camera[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2024, 53(6): 202400. (in Chinese). [10] 范志刚, 常虹, 陈守谦. 透镜无热装配中粘结层的设计[J]. 光学 精密工程, 2011, 19(11): 2573-2581.FAN ZH G, CHANG H, CHEN SH Q. Design of bonding layer in lens athermal mount[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2011, 19(11): 2573-2581. (in Chinese). [11] 张家齐, 郭艺博, 张友建, 等. 机载宽温条件下反射镜组件与粘接层设计[J]. 中国光学(中英文), 2023, 16(3): 578-586. doi: 10.37188/CO.2022-0194ZHANG J Q, GUO Y B, ZHANG Y J, et al. Design of reflector assembly and adhesive layer under airborne wide temperature conditions[J]. Chinese Optics, 2023, 16(3): 578-586. (in Chinese). doi: 10.37188/CO.2022-0194 [12] BAYAR M. Lens barrel optomechanical design principles[J]. Optical Engineering, 1981, 20(2): 202181. doi: 10.1117/12.7972687 [13] 刘强, 何欣. 反射镜用光学环氧胶粘接固化工艺研究[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2011(2): 118-120. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3997.2011.02.048LIU Q, HE X. Investigation on solidification technics of pastern in space mirror[J]. Machinery Design & Manufacture, 2011(2): 118-120. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3997.2011.02.048 [14] 赵天骄, 乔彦峰, 孙宁, 等. 经纬仪主镜在支撑系统下的面形变化[J]. 中国光学, 2017, 10(4): 477-483.ZHAO T J, QIAO Y F, SUN N, et al. Surface deformation of theodolite primary mirrorunder the support system[J]. Chinese Optics, 2017, 10(4): 477-483. (in Chinese). [15] 韩旭, 吴清文, 董得义, 等. 室温硫化胶层建模在透镜结构分析中的应用[J]. 光学 精密工程, 2010, 18(1): 118-125.HAN X, WU Q W, DONG D Y, et al. Application of RTV adhesive modeling to structure analysis of ref lective mirror[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2010, 18(1): 118-125. (in Chinese). [16] 张黄轲, 李子凡, 施文恺, 等. 基于哈特曼探测器的光学传递函数测量方法研究[J]. 中国光学(中英文), 2025, 18(4): 819-829.ZHANG H K, LI Z F, SHI W K, et al. Optical transfer function measurement based on Hartmann wavefront sensor[J]. Chinese Optics, 2025, 18(4): 819-829. (in Chinese). [17] 郭乃菲, 孙亮, 何玲平, 等. 基于紫外增强空间光调制技术的单光子计数成像探测系[J]. 光学 精密工程, 2026, 34(1): 44-52.GUO N F, SUN L, HE L P, et al. Single-photon-counting imaging detection system based on UV-enhanced spatial light modulation technology[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2026, 34(1): 44-52. (in Chinese). -
下载: